🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has previously stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if such assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."